Thursday, January 31, 2019
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Just Release the innovations (Otherwise it is fascist or a control freak at the helm.)
Is this how tool control happens? Control the tools to the humans and control the message of what "is" is. Just release the innovations that were squandered from humanity since the American Civil War. Many of these patents are related to the technology that runs non Earth Craft(s.)
https://youtu.be/U0XgnDmsSNc
https://youtu.be/U0XgnDmsSNc
Monday, January 28, 2019
How Economics Became a Cult
Use this program to use a model of the us goverment economy
https://youtu.be/JeplRmADW3E
The World has Hikikomori (the modern lost monk)
https://youtu.be/oFgWy2ifX5s
Hikikomori need to be studied by social and physclogists alike. Economists take note to see what improvements can be made to GDP and wellbeing models alike.
Hikikomori need to be studied by social and physclogists alike. Economists take note to see what improvements can be made to GDP and wellbeing models alike.
Is it fear, is it bullying, is it self cast from society. Hikikomori exist worldwide and have existed for a long time. They exist like monks and mediators.
Sunday, January 27, 2019
10 skills employers will want the most in 2020
https://www.businessinsider.com/10-skills-employers-will-want-the-most-in-2020-2018-1
Former Covert CIA Agent Tells All
https://youtu.be/8VoLD_tu5fQ
I bet lack of political support is because of making an insurance claim (and their lawyers denying the claim or potential claim) versus the safety of the people.
I bet lack of political support is because of making an insurance claim (and their lawyers denying the claim or potential claim) versus the safety of the people.
Friday, January 25, 2019
Thursday, January 24, 2019
America Not Growing? All because of a Wall?
https://youtu.be/zMzlWeQC3_0
It is my opinion that some people on this planet who are wealthy and extremely powerful have said no more money for America. Trump used it for a boarder wall and call it racist for no money? Is that ethical politics to get money back in America? (This is about net equity, not the printing press or fed reserve policy.)
If MSNBC reported accurately that many economists are saying zero or near zero GDP growth in quarter 1 of 2019 due to the negotiations going on; then, it is my opinion that this economy is not worth investing in until the private market is profitable or growing again.
Data tells the truth. A declining goverment budget with lower job hiring gains equals less potential of the private market to grow GDP and Net National Product. Titration is a chemistry term that means to find ballance for your goal (usually to find the neutral pH of a liquid and will take acid and base mixes to get to 7.0 pH.) For an adaptation to economics, I surmise that the balance point is zero GDP growth to find where everyone stands on the balance sheet. This argument with low job growth numbers will be used by investors worldwide to say that America as 'too many bugs' in it and will shun American investment. Overall, America is screwed and the Federal Reserve knows it:
https://www.thecapitalideas.com/articles/outlook/us-outlook
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2018/12/01/jerome-powell-and-the-interest-rate-forecast-yes-they-are-going-up/#54d85f3a79bb
Make no mistake though, when the US Government spends money, the growth will be there again; especially, if the Federal Reserve is rate bullish (but teeters on neutral.)
It is my opinion that some people on this planet who are wealthy and extremely powerful have said no more money for America. Trump used it for a boarder wall and call it racist for no money? Is that ethical politics to get money back in America? (This is about net equity, not the printing press or fed reserve policy.)
If MSNBC reported accurately that many economists are saying zero or near zero GDP growth in quarter 1 of 2019 due to the negotiations going on; then, it is my opinion that this economy is not worth investing in until the private market is profitable or growing again.
Data tells the truth. A declining goverment budget with lower job hiring gains equals less potential of the private market to grow GDP and Net National Product. Titration is a chemistry term that means to find ballance for your goal (usually to find the neutral pH of a liquid and will take acid and base mixes to get to 7.0 pH.) For an adaptation to economics, I surmise that the balance point is zero GDP growth to find where everyone stands on the balance sheet. This argument with low job growth numbers will be used by investors worldwide to say that America as 'too many bugs' in it and will shun American investment. Overall, America is screwed and the Federal Reserve knows it:
https://www.thecapitalideas.com/articles/outlook/us-outlook
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2018/12/01/jerome-powell-and-the-interest-rate-forecast-yes-they-are-going-up/#54d85f3a79bb
Make no mistake though, when the US Government spends money, the growth will be there again; especially, if the Federal Reserve is rate bullish (but teeters on neutral.)
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
Monday, January 21, 2019
Sunday, January 20, 2019
Advanced Math Help Needed (please solve and post publicly)
If anyone can help solve for this problem. It will aid me in solving for perfect money or monitary systems
D(M) = a + (Q/(q-b))
S(M) = logn(q) = log base n to q
Q and q are different variables but respond to the same domain. Q is a real number q is the domain
M is the range, D(M) and S(M) are two different functions with the same demand for M (as in money)
a, Q, b and n are all real numbers
q is the domain of M, M is the range. D and S are functions. Assuming M and q and related are are part of the same function... (ie, M is highly correlated to q and are synonymous with each other.) Also I could have made D(q) and S(q) as functions but wanted to make the work different as I am dealing with 25-50+ variables.
let D(M) = S(M)
in algebra...
thus q = N^(a+(Q/(q-b)))
solve for q
maybe use Lambert W(xe^x) function to equal x?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function
more algebra and a few failures where q gets trapped inside of the base.
a(q-b) +Q = logn(q^(q-b))
assuming n = e or limit n to e
and some algebra...
e^(a(q-b)+Q) = q^(q-b)
as per generic form
as e=e, q =x, Q=b, b=c, a=a,
e^(a(x-c)+b) = x^(x-c)
and using u substitution as x-c = u thus u+c = x
and per generic as reversing the limit n to e
n^(a(x-c)+b) = x^(x-c)
and with u substitution
n^(a(u)+b) = x^(u)
and v substitution as v = au+b therefore
n^v = x^u
therefore n^(v/u)=x
but x is part of v and u therefore not solved
v is a line and u is a difference function per asymptote
maybe solve with lambert w funciton?
so if limit n approaches e thus e^v = x^u
and multiply both sides
(v/u)e^(v/u) = (v/u)x^u
W((v/u)x^u)) = v/u
v/u = a+(b/(x-c))
thus the technique did not work as the x is inside the Lambert W function as well as outside the said function, cannot combine x, respectively.
There might be another way with Lambert W function but needs more algebra... a quick answer would be liked.
Another approach is to raise the base
n^v = x^u
distribute the a in function v
n^(ax - ac + b) = x^(x-c)
is also
(n^ax)*(n^(-ac))*(n^b) = x^(x-c)
group like terms together
(n^(ac)) = (x^(c-x)) * n^(ax+b)
two different bases are involved with the line and the difference function. notice x^(c-x) is the opposite of x^(x-c) and is done due to algebra of exponents.
if limit n approaches x then all the bases are the same.
(x^(ac)) = (x^(c-x)) * x^(ax+b) and is solvable by raising the equation by log base x
x^(ac) = x^(c-x+ax+b)
logx(x^(ac)) = logx(^(c-x+ax+b)) = ac = c-x+ax+b
ac + c = ax - x + b
c(a+1) = x(a-1) + b therefore x = ((c(a+1)-b)/(a-1) if and only if limit n approaches x
otherwise not solvable??
I really want a discrete base n as related to x so I can solve q.
It is hypothesized by me that I would have to merge the bases. Maybe another way to merge the bases per Lambert W function? I doubt it but it would be necessary to complete the problem. the only way to solve the equation is to use a limit as n approaches x or e...
Please help, any mathematician. Calculus or higher level mathematics may be needed.
This project would be important for economics as the formals at the top represent a supply and demand equations. Of which I will divlulge any further details. the x as domain and solving for x is important. Maybe solve for range then domain?
Keep in mind I am simplifying the formulas as presented above.
Please present solutions per public recourse via youtube or any other method. I am sure the machines (artificial intelligence) will like to take on this puzzle.
D(M) = a + (Q/(q-b))
S(M) = logn(q) = log base n to q
Q and q are different variables but respond to the same domain. Q is a real number q is the domain
M is the range, D(M) and S(M) are two different functions with the same demand for M (as in money)
a, Q, b and n are all real numbers
q is the domain of M, M is the range. D and S are functions. Assuming M and q and related are are part of the same function... (ie, M is highly correlated to q and are synonymous with each other.) Also I could have made D(q) and S(q) as functions but wanted to make the work different as I am dealing with 25-50+ variables.
let D(M) = S(M)
in algebra...
thus q = N^(a+(Q/(q-b)))
solve for q
maybe use Lambert W(xe^x) function to equal x?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function
more algebra and a few failures where q gets trapped inside of the base.
a(q-b) +Q = logn(q^(q-b))
assuming n = e or limit n to e
and some algebra...
e^(a(q-b)+Q) = q^(q-b)
as per generic form
as e=e, q =x, Q=b, b=c, a=a,
e^(a(x-c)+b) = x^(x-c)
and using u substitution as x-c = u thus u+c = x
and per generic as reversing the limit n to e
n^(a(x-c)+b) = x^(x-c)
and with u substitution
n^(a(u)+b) = x^(u)
and v substitution as v = au+b therefore
n^v = x^u
therefore n^(v/u)=x
but x is part of v and u therefore not solved
v is a line and u is a difference function per asymptote
maybe solve with lambert w funciton?
so if limit n approaches e thus e^v = x^u
and multiply both sides
(v/u)e^(v/u) = (v/u)x^u
W((v/u)x^u)) = v/u
v/u = a+(b/(x-c))
thus the technique did not work as the x is inside the Lambert W function as well as outside the said function, cannot combine x, respectively.
There might be another way with Lambert W function but needs more algebra... a quick answer would be liked.
Another approach is to raise the base
n^v = x^u
distribute the a in function v
n^(ax - ac + b) = x^(x-c)
is also
(n^ax)*(n^(-ac))*(n^b) = x^(x-c)
group like terms together
(n^(ac)) = (x^(c-x)) * n^(ax+b)
two different bases are involved with the line and the difference function. notice x^(c-x) is the opposite of x^(x-c) and is done due to algebra of exponents.
if limit n approaches x then all the bases are the same.
(x^(ac)) = (x^(c-x)) * x^(ax+b) and is solvable by raising the equation by log base x
x^(ac) = x^(c-x+ax+b)
logx(x^(ac)) = logx(^(c-x+ax+b)) = ac = c-x+ax+b
ac + c = ax - x + b
c(a+1) = x(a-1) + b therefore x = ((c(a+1)-b)/(a-1) if and only if limit n approaches x
otherwise not solvable??
I really want a discrete base n as related to x so I can solve q.
It is hypothesized by me that I would have to merge the bases. Maybe another way to merge the bases per Lambert W function? I doubt it but it would be necessary to complete the problem. the only way to solve the equation is to use a limit as n approaches x or e...
Please help, any mathematician. Calculus or higher level mathematics may be needed.
This project would be important for economics as the formals at the top represent a supply and demand equations. Of which I will divlulge any further details. the x as domain and solving for x is important. Maybe solve for range then domain?
Keep in mind I am simplifying the formulas as presented above.
Please present solutions per public recourse via youtube or any other method. I am sure the machines (artificial intelligence) will like to take on this puzzle.
Saturday, January 19, 2019
FAA Is Silencing Employees
https://youtu.be/u6mrt3SWdxc
It is not just about UFO's it is about the control of public preception
It is not just about UFO's it is about the control of public preception
Friday, January 18, 2019
Monday, January 14, 2019
Policing for Profit? California Towns Bill Residents Thousands for Nuisance Violations
https://youtu.be/1SLKi5Z3JR8
Sunday, January 13, 2019
Durham NC Becomes First City to Ban Training By Israeli Police and Then be Forced to Reconsider It
https://youtu.be/ElYUODNsWb4
Saturday, January 12, 2019
What Happens To Religious Professionals When They Stop Believing In God (HBO)
https://youtu.be/1zwcwHbSaGQ
For the record: I still believe in God. I believe in Jesus.
For the record: I still believe in God. I believe in Jesus.
Impossible Burger now impossibly close to the real thing
https://youtu.be/63FHZy_7-qs
Now made with real soy
Now made with real soy
FIGHTING THE SKY Official Trailer (2019) Alien Invasion, New Movie Trailers HD
https://youtu.be/0PrKC0zAJ0U
Conservative Neighborhoods
https://youtu.be/6ANfAR2Kjow
I beleve this might be illegal, a real estate rights lawyer needs to look into this per jurisdiction.
I beleve this might be illegal, a real estate rights lawyer needs to look into this per jurisdiction.
Friday, January 11, 2019
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
Sunday, January 6, 2019
Chinese Moral Crisis
https://youtu.be/FfLnFVzfKBs
All of planet earth is going to go though a moral crisis soon. Communism does kill morals as it assumes itself as the "atheist" church.
All of planet earth is going to go though a moral crisis soon. Communism does kill morals as it assumes itself as the "atheist" church.
Shut Up Millennials
https://youtu.be/VdmeV0GJ-oE
No we will not shut up.
We vote as the elderly die, as like many that preceded before us. Mr. Biden does not have the wherewithal for aging....?
No we will not shut up.
We vote as the elderly die, as like many that preceded before us. Mr. Biden does not have the wherewithal for aging....?
Tuesday, January 1, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)