tonyotag's site: December 2021

Because in economics, if the scales are unbalanced, there are profits to be made. What politicians are not trying to balance via practice what they preach? In the mirror they see themselves as cowards (or prisoner's dilemma.)

Robby Soave: Despite Omicron PANIC, The Covid Emergency Is Over. It's Time We Act Like It

https://youtu.be/T6gSAB1Ol5w

Mohamed El-Erian: The Fed should recognize it was caught 'massively offsides'

https://youtu.be/aapoUpmhjmc

*Inflation is a pricing game that lenders/banks play to sell more loans and for the empire grows. How many wars did America Start Win new territory to tax? zero and maybe one or two. The math does not compute for a favorable outcome for civilian life with fiat currency. The Fed has been played by some kind of entity. This entity has given the instructions of "now is the time to take the spike and drive it though for the next 9 years."
I predict in or around 2032, the federal reserve will lose reserve currency status and cryptocurrency will rise to a new global level.

'Japanification’: As U.S. Inflation Surges, Here’s Why Japan’s Prices Have Held Steady | WSJ

https://youtu.be/lSJis2K6B8Q

*Long Supply chains in United States does not help the situation compared to Japan. Besides the ports and ocean, America's lower 48 states is vastly larger in land mass than the main five Japanese islands.

*An international standard of inflation needed? (rhetorical question; but if gets enough press or attention I will respond)

Monday, December 13, 2021

WHAT IS HAPPENING? GLOBAL UFO Events Leave News Media Shook!

https://youtu.be/lIS04ehxsnw

EXPOSED: US Gov Censorship FAIL Of YouTube Video

https://youtu.be/8NYty1om6tU

'Pelosi Is Hiding Evidence!' Louie Gohmert Says Jan. 6 Detainees Treated Inhumanely

https://youtu.be/zF_ni85BV_Q

Sunday, December 12, 2021

The World's Most Dangerous Drug Wars | News on Drugs

https://youtu.be/U2YfG7NKvoU

Saturday, December 11, 2021

The Toad Venom Pamphlet That Changed Psychedelia Forever | HAMILTON'S PHARMACOPEIA

https://youtu.be/3WMA1_PdgRQ

China Has A Debt Problem Three Times Larger Than Evergrande

https://youtu.be/ITvXlax4ZXk

Best evidence for lab leak theory | Jamie Metzl and Lex Fridman

https://youtu.be/nYEUljSI9dY

The push for a four-day workweek

https://youtu.be/fQV6LtGcrXw

Trevor Noah Called “Anti-Vaxxer” For Questioning Big Pharma

https://youtu.be/5iW_iVQ-c6Y

*Question their profits, they will question your prophets.

South African Scientists Say They Were Punished For Omicron Discovery

https://youtu.be/zwBumLtaIBw

Robby Soave: Jussie Smollett Takes The Stand & BOMBS. Reportedly RECEIVED Help From CNN's Don Lemon

https://youtu.be/8yqfHH7PP3U

Robby Soave: Jussie Smollett Takes The Stand & BOMBS. Reportedly RECEIVED Help From CNN's Don Lemon

https://youtu.be/8yqfHH7PP3U

Biden Press Secretary’s Free COVID Test Freakout

https://youtu.be/tBuTUdEIm_M

*I, tonyotag, am not a huge fan of government mandated tests. I understand the logic of providing such as for controlling the virus; but wonder what kind of planned dystopia institutional provisions can provide. I, tonyotag, do NOT endorse mandated covid-19 testing.

How NASA’s New James Webb Telescope Could Reveal the First Galaxies | WSJ

https://youtu.be/rI4alFk5agQ

Long-term interest rates are stuck, we're in a global debt trap: Morgan Stanley's Sharma

https://youtu.be/gjHW8kM1mDw

Friday, December 10, 2021

Chief Justice John Roberts warns Supreme Court over Texas abortion law [Abortion providers Sue Whom case?]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/chief-justice-john-roberts-warns-supreme-court-over-texas-abortion-n1285747

How to Prepare for a Solar Flare Hitting Earth (Because It's Probably Going to Happen)

https://lifehacker.com/how-to-prepare-for-a-solar-flare-hitting-earth-because-1848076402

Psaki MOCKS Notion Of Sending Every American A COVID Test, Neoliberal Elitism On FULL Display

https://youtu.be/SYmERBkAv9Q

How Do You Design an Airfield? An Airport Planner Explains | WSJ

https://youtu.be/4mkpJkdk-1A

Thursday, December 9, 2021

iPhone will tell you its service history with new iOS 15.2: my thoughts

https://youtu.be/X4BA4ZhJc-w

How DEMOCRATS Caused The Abortion Crisis

https://youtu.be/cXZxz7jcKlI

Wednesday, December 8, 2021

Surprise Medical Bills Coming to an End?

https://youtu.be/BKyP-MqIt68

Can The Inflation Crisis In The U.S. Be Stopped?

https://youtu.be/FA0YrkxOLbs

* The Philips curve does not model time lags in employment and inflation as we have seen in the last two recessionary cycles' effects.

CHINA Claims "ALIEN HUT" On Moon In New Rover Image!

https://youtu.be/JJRTpGU2Vgc

*dark stripe like blur on blurry "hut" or rock might be a door or doorway

Evergrande Says It’s Back to Work, But Homeowners Say Not Fast Enough | WSJ

https://youtu.be/1asNsDsbPOE

Tuesday, December 7, 2021

Did Avocado Cartels Kill the Butterfly King?

https://youtu.be/Y_0tS1jRvXg

Bill Gates Has Given $319 Million to Media Outlets

https://youtu.be/us-andJDfWw

Monday, December 6, 2021

Analyzing the shipping backlog from one of America's busiest ports

https://youtu.be/DE_qWnhYQQw

Sunday, December 5, 2021

This Loophole Makes Most Americans Susceptible to Government Surveillance

https://youtu.be/KDai5Ntb-bg

'This Rings True On Social Media': GOP Rep. Waves Around 1984, By George Orwell

https://youtu.be/kI4fIw4WleU

Biden Continues Trump’s Immigration Policies — Dems Silent

https://youtu.be/OMcS7VxVfME

The Explosive Rise Of Dollar Stores

https://youtu.be/yQmJpNGclpc

Saturday, December 4, 2021

Democrats’ Vaccine Hypocrisy Exposed

https://youtu.be/gcsacdcdyzQ

Robby Soave: Rittenhouse ASU Expulsion Protests Are LAUGHABLE, He’s Not Even A Student

https://youtu.be/xZuXRv_eu9k

Greece Announces FINES For Unvaccinated Over Age 60

https://youtu.be/8V0Hy2JdC0w

Court BLOCKS Texas Social Media "Equality" Law (NetChoice v. Texas)

https://youtu.be/bUSM7UoC_ic

How Amazon Beat Supply Chain Chaos With Ships, Containers And Planes

https://youtu.be/HxXJ8Q2GCs4

How India Became the New Hope for Tech Investors

https://youtu.be/Keme8oxHHPQ

'No One In The Milky Way Believes These Bills Cost Nothing': Kennedy Presses Yellen On BBB

https://youtu.be/fHJ_PKl7UN0

*Who else does he know that is not on Earth?

Joe Biden INSISTS He Can't Do Anything

https://youtu.be/6ougmShlQMI

Friday, December 3, 2021

Shoplifting getting so bad even the New York Times can't provide cover for it

https://youtu.be/mzQoloBLZtI

Abortion could become a business nightmare in 2022 [WITH IMPORTANT tonyotag OPINION]

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/abortion-could-become-a-business-nightmare-in-2022-171335587.html

*A split in states rights for abortion could mean more segmentation for businesses seeking to grow. Take the cell phone industry for an example. Sure there are 4 3 major players: T Mobile (is now merged with Sprint), AT&T, Verizon; and there are many smaller players that use their (major players') towers and telecom networks; but, do consumers (or citizens) know the difference of what each company stands for when it comes to major political issues? I bet marginally so. Consumers would have to research (or find aggregated information online about which company is better per their political ideology.) Keep in mind that such a website probably exists and I, tonyotag, just don't want to look it up or google it, etc...

In the cell phone company example above, all the major players would have to do is create companies (or sway the current ones) to both political extremes and play the consumer for what cell phone company endorses and for what means to an end (even if it means to spend company money on lobbyists for proof of politics.) This itself is inevitable if our current political parties keep playing "god" with human allowances and expectations of what the legal definition of "is" is. [Side note: The justification to be aware of politics?]

Keep in mind I, tonyotag, am not an advocate of such corporate or business morals behavior; however, it might as well be a catch-22 or quagmire. How so? A unified policy (of any kind) mimics the rules of the game to make more profits. If there is a split that is easy to navigate due to state boundaries, then the same player could own two ends of the same stick (while holding the middle of the stick) controlling the entire stick and a way to strike you (or me, tonyotag) on the head. In other words, companies (and their leaders) want division to sell and gain market share for both sides, of which, will aggregate such power per profits and therefore make it harder to reverse the legal landscape to previous status quo. Likewise, such power can be concentrated to a hegemony in a way to control such politics. The catch-22 is the gain of profits if such a legal rule (anti-abortion) is implemented and then could not be taken away later due to impacts to profits and subsequent tax revenues, etc... The quagmire is that profits are being taken for the sake of limited rights at the behest of belief and organization of policy, where one feeds on another until there cannot be a end of such policy because of the livelihood that such a rule (of any kind of law or enforcement) would represent. Furthermore, an additional quagmire exists per liberty of law per jurisdiction is itself the justification of such law, for marginal up to absolute degree of such liberty or lack thereof.

Therefore, for I tonyotag to endorse business behavior to make businesses to capitalize on politics is itself immoral. It is a dead end. It is itself a way to "divide and conquer" by splitting up the people. The camp them (us) as American citizens into one or another. To place a price of distance* to get what people want who have met a "test of birth"** and keep an imposement of law as living heritage, no matter who that master of law is, as a way to maximize profits is itself a duty of greed; and yes, the seven deadly sins is a tactic to maximize the benefits of war, at least to those who are the victors.

This itself is a definition of war mongering at its finest. Do not confuse this for a call of or for civil war, for that is what the enemy of humans wants...war (of any kind.) Not just more retail segments, not just more investment segments like pro abortion or anti-abortion hedge funds, but allurement for hearts' final rest. For idle hands are a devil's play things are a point of view that all (argumentative) sides point to for justification for political change is an argument to say the word "devil" in the first place. Likewise, the greatest benefit for death is always arguing for things to allure the heart to rest. Alas, this argument breaks as it justifies making more borders than erasing them for an easier and peaceful life. Hence is why abortion and the connection to arguing for the state, and all the citizens (in default as per what the law would read) to be for or against abortion itself a dead end (or a quagmire/catch-22.)

Besides such digression of moral implications that such a Supreme Court decision would make. What practical matter of business could be considered? Why produce a dead end? Any investor (of money, time, voting, etc...) must consider these facts and logic as mentioned above. This thing called abortion, is a no-win situation. And not any amount of government, governing, or alchemy (even that of love) can solve such issue upon the logic thereof. Thus, what is the solution? Out of the four parts of aggregate supply in economics here is what I, tonyotag, know:

Labor - Marginal depending on the situation. More, cheaper labor, is in favor of anti-abortion laws for medium and long term investing. Pro-choice for short term per labor intensity because the further along a pregnancy a women is, the reduced likelihood of working (especially in second and third trimester.)

Capital - Douglass-Cobb function ties in labor and capital and therefore would be in favor of anti-abortion laws and is marginal. See Labor above for marginal reasons why.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobb%E2%80%93Douglas_production_function

Technological - is marginal pro-choice. More information found about pregnancy and the fetus as shared with the decision maker increases the chance of an accurate outcome (utility of the pregnant woman makes a choice) Information including but not limited to legal, scientific, and practical implementation of what to do next can influence such decision. Technology can influence how much these factors can weigh on what the outcome would be. It is beneficial for all participants in an economy (individual to social (such as government, corporate, institutional, etc...)) to encourage and invest into technological factors that maximize solutions and information. Accuracy of the information as related to the properties of the local environment ("laws of physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, etc...") is paramount.

Institutional (law, governance, and practical implementation of the other three aggregate supply segments) - is the constant per morals of society and its election thereof. Neutral.

Hence, to answer such question at the beginning of this opinion: Would a split in states rights for abortion mean more segmentation for businesses seeking to grow? the answer is a foreboding yes. America is to "sin" no matter what it did, collectively or individually. Multiple businesses would cater and profit as the American public is capitalistic in nature and would default to libertarian notions of "States Rights." Ironic sentiment is possible as libertarian ideals is to have no anti-abortion laws as per the yahoo article above suggests with inferred polling.

Hopes of a unified (national) policy are dashed as a globally liberal but American called conservative movement creates a theocracy using abortion as a means test per population density per jurisdiction.Rural areas are hungry for labor so the default is for anti-abortion. Generally, people learn (from any age) their lessons from the wealthiest or most economically proficient individuals or leaders. Rural areas tend to have a population that learns its lessons from their main industry: agriculture. Many of these lessons (from the past and now) are of husbandry.*** Husbandry reinforce the rural condition out of practicality and frugality; nonetheless, synonyms describe the conditions of many rural areas: economy, frugality, parsimony, penny-pinching, providence, scrimping, skimping, thrift.) Such definitions fit with the need for more economic resources such as labor to fill the gap of the other three aggregate supply resources not (or marginally) met: capital, technology, institutional. This will always be true for rural areas until the resources are met. Politically, rural areas will have a tendency to have an easier time to believe because of lack and uses belief systems (including but not limited to judeo-christian principals) to reinforce husbandry as human breeding and its benefits. Note that the use of husbandry does not mean large family size, although if anti-abortion laws were present, gross domestic product or income per capita would be lower if and only if the other three aggregate supply methods were not supplied (technology, capital, institutions.)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/husbandry#synonyms

A solution seems to appear that censorship is a problem. Besides capital, technology and institutional structures are a present hinderance that needs to be cured. Currently, many innovations are censored by the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951**** and in turn reinforce an ignorance for the entire population. Although presently improving due to capital investments for more information technology to reach rural populations, rural areas especially have this issue because of lower information technology access. Such access has been at odds with moral division between urban and rural due to practices and beliefs of what to do in certain situations. A consequence of more equal information access per the division of management strategies. Thus, what is the true culprit here? The timing of when an invention becomes uncensored to provide answers for a more accurate management of human fetuses into babies; or the management practice of civil rights ("pro-choice" versus "pro-life?") Keep in mind that the invention does not have to be directly involved with pregnancy, it just has to free up resources or provide practical daily life answers to be of benefit to an issue at hand. If there was such innovation, why keep it censored? Answers more than questions are a conclusion of such discussion of an issue, thus censorship of any means creates division of opinion. Therefore, the current political situation about abortion nationwide is both a management and technological censorship problem; and, if this is the case, then what entity (may be non-human) wants the beneift of a bias decision under a censored system?

Abortion is only one of the many issues that have become divisive in politics; and censorship, as well as moral, economic, and legal quagmires and catch-22's develop or maintained for the sake of some kind of deadly sin. To lesson or eliminate such effects, release the innovation. The population, the citizens of the United States is what many work for (W-2, 1099, and investor-earners) and the increased imposed ignorance via censorship of facts is itself a greater moral sin than the revealing of such technologies and/or present legal environment is (or could be developed by having such censorship (like pro or anti-abortion laws.)) In conclusion, this issue is purposely placed into society for the sake of sinning no matter what and to control a divide and conquer attitude among the populous of Earth (let alone America.)

*Price of distance is basis cost in economics. Anti-abortion laws and pro-choice laws per state will increase the basis costs for an abortion. Therefore, be a tax upon the poor. (probably be a marginal plus flat tax if judged from a monetary perspective.)

**Test of birth is a method of justifying if a person should be taken seriously as a matter of law or not. Under Roe v Wade, as judged from the article above, the test is met if the fetus is viable outside the womb. Original test of birth is when the baby is born then is a person. Hence, Roe v Wade is a closer standard than original test of birth from conception (sperm meets ova.)

*** husbandry is middle-English (14th century) and is possible that humans are treated like animals and raised in animal like conditions to produce the feeling of human breeding (NOT eugenics; just make more humans for the sake of more labor and the benefits of offspring.) Husbandry when applied to humans is human breeding; yet, would fragile or frugal minds know the difference or implication between quality versus quantity? This irks the question.

**** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_Secrecy_Act

Why Japan's Young Space Agency Is Mastering This Critical Skill

https://youtu.be/sh_kl9eiMfc

We gotta talk about cheese... (sorry)

https://youtu.be/_u_sLantkq4

*Food Supply does not count because the distance the energy of the sun traveled in time is much shorter than fossil fuels.

I would rather focus on fossil fuels for carbon control, than the food supply because fossil fuels are a choice. The players in the military industrial complex and those who have kept "the secret" know what I am talking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_Secrecy_Act

Lex Fridman: Would aliens have the same math as humans?

https://youtu.be/dt6E6ypvpmY

Featured Post

Search This Blog

Friday, December 31, 2021

Thursday, December 30, 2021

Wednesday, December 29, 2021

Monday, December 27, 2021

Sunday, December 26, 2021

Saturday, December 25, 2021

Friday, December 24, 2021

Thursday, December 23, 2021

Wednesday, December 22, 2021

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

Monday, December 20, 2021

Sunday, December 19, 2021

Saturday, December 18, 2021

Friday, December 17, 2021

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

Tuesday, December 14, 2021