Doug Jones Wins in Alabama *(Parties Lose 1.7% to write ins)

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/alabama-senate-special-election-roy-moore-doug-jones

Three percent is the best way to describe this election. 1.7 percent to write-ins (voters rejecting the parties in voting none of the above) and 1.5 percent spread between both candidates. I personally believe that that is too narrow and is part of standard deviation (but not of plurality of votes) and therefore Doug Jones and Joy Moore are part of the same problem.

Not the same problem of the differences in their platforms, the same problems of partisan politics that is taking the planet by storm. The same problem of liberty of though of truth by science and inter-generational faith of learning, rather than the rhetoric as a way to dramatically divide thought though the logic of humanity. (Of that faith of learning, comes a point of reaching an inner-god..?) From logic comes the point that if the parties are radically different, than what portfolio does it or they as both parties protect?

You must ask yourself this question as a human being. At what stage do we forget the true crisis in our county of America and the World, when technocratic fascism is coming to our planet. I know so as there are alphabet soups of agencies goverment and non-goverment, profit and non-profit (or non-loss or non-risk) that would like to own humanity by manipulating the thoughts of progression. Understand that this entire blog is dedicated to showing that there are inventions, frontiers, of science not yet explored and places explored, yet certain powers do want to keep secret because of their greed and want to balance and improve their portfolio and holdings of their wealth and/or bloodline.

I understand it seems weird to argue that one would do such a thing; but in terms of God or of some kind of logical thing (like humans or otherworldly creatures) not wanting to take care of humanity in a way that would disrespect it, is it such a reasonable argument that two opposing forces may dance around a concept like a chess match; like two different masters using the same strategy and thought but never killing each other, only ending up in enslaving more pawns? I ask you this as to think what the true game is and who the enemy is? Is the enemy nature, humanity, God, Devil, faith, fact, ignorance, planning? A list of dichotomies can go on forever, but a move on a chess board must be made before the other player can move.

I argue the fundamental hypothesis that we are in the mist of a revolution brewing. A revolution of non-status-quo. A revolution of outright logic overbearing the pawns and striking the master. Yet, that has happened before and so called when the coin flipps between one party or the other. I argue a diffrent revolution, I argue a way to trust oneself and the universe and what it gives. I argue a way in faith (so called God) that some of the jedi would call "the force." I argue nonchalant action. 

(Hark, is not that what the Amish did?) And so it is best to find and defend and propagate ideas far and wide to spread the magic of invention so that all of us as humanity can flurish on Earth, beyond Earth, and beyond the hot and cold of known physics, and of course to live and rest in peace.