https://youtu.be/s1UT2Ms5E2k
https://www.youtube.com/user/nalldavid/videos
Structuring limitation laws needed. If you earned the money then that is revenue, plan and simple. If you spend the money then expense plane and simple. Too many accounts for simple business then that raises the cost of business. The various agencies that enforce accounting laws need a KISS test: the Keep It Simple Stupid test. The test would be judicial in nature of law. Law would be legislated to take first steps to curb asset leisure due to investigation.
Additionally, escrow per enforcement is needed instead of civil forfeiture laws. If the asset is money (United States Dollar) or like money (cryptocurrency, foreign currency, etc...) then the money is placed with a neutral third party that gives the money to the winning party (defendant per count per not guilty verdict and plaintiff (usually the state or federal goverment) per guilty verdict.) The neutral third party can be picked by a judge if both parties cannot be certain of who is to keep the money. If a judge picks the third party then it will be the court or officer of the court, ie can be a neutral lawyer. Transaction is kept like a real estate transaction where closing is finalized by a judge or court. The court can keep the asset locked up until appeals have been considered.
If the plaintiff gets the money per state forfeiture then the assets must be legislated on what should be done with the assets (auction for money, deposit per bank, etc...) Additionally, law enforcement agencies should not get any forfeiture money at any time, all cases are independent of each other per asset to avoid rampant government seizure of property. Legislature can allow the executive branch to have a program to allow received monies from escrow, but not direct forfeiture assets. A guilty verdict is needed to prove the executive branch can use the money.
This shit stops now with me when I run for goverment office. Vote for tonyotag today.
No comments:
Post a Comment