BDS laws per contract versus money in politics. If money in politics is freedom of speech then the courts (on a conservative level at of the Supreme Court Of the United States) must defend pro boycott choices of individuals (including corporations as people legal status.) If boycotts are illegal then freedom of speech should go away... hmmmm..... I guess this is a conflict that can be exploited at the ballot box.
For the record I am pro-choice of boycotts AND pro-money in politics.
My logic for this is that if money is taken away from political thinking then congress cannot appropriate funds in a way that would maximize the profits. Unfortunately, there is no to little policy about the equivalence of wealth except tax and spend policies that labor a goal that everyone wants...wealth. So, the argument of envy thy neighbor's wealth is itself defeating as it drives a wedge away from positive management solutions that a community/society/nation needs. What America lacks is good managers in key places making good polices.
This subject is quite dynamic as it can form over generations to create a giant bad solution that looks good to qualify for public policy. It is my opinion that there are five to seven variables that are similar enough for the average voter (80% of voters to assume the 80/20 rule) that will vote on. It is unfortunate that this is hard to communicate in such brevity; however, it is something that must be done to enforce the ideals of good public polices should happen to become.
No comments:
Post a Comment